https://www.tcspc.de/ 2026-04-23T18:40:53+00:00 https://www.tcspc.de/ https://www.tcspc.de/lib/exe/fetch.php/logo.png text/html 2025-03-11T08:19:29+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.tcspc.de/doku.php/faq:novaflim_calculated_irf?rev=1741681169&do=diff <table><tr><th colspan="2" width="50%">2025/02/18 14:49</th><th colspan="2" width="50%">current</th></tr><tr><td class="diff-blockheader" colspan="2">Line 1:</td> <td class="diff-blockheader" colspan="2">Line 1:</td> </tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">====== NovaFLIM Calculated IRF ======</td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">====== NovaFLIM Calculated IRF ======</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class="diff-lineheader">+</td><td class="diff-addedline">{{tag&gt; faq software novaflim IRF}}</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class="diff-lineheader">+</td><td class="diff-addedline"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context"></td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">In the Nova Flim the IRF is parameterized as a combination of two Gaussian curves (a total of 5 fit parameters). These parameters are adjusted during Initial Fit.&#160;</td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">In the Nova Flim the IRF is parameterized as a combination of two Gaussian curves (a total of 5 fit parameters). These parameters are adjusted during Initial Fit.&#160;</td></tr> </table> text/html 2025-02-14T09:43:52+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.tcspc.de/doku.php/faq:start?rev=1739526232&do=diff <table><tr><th colspan="2" width="50%">2025/02/14 10:43</th><th colspan="2" width="50%">current</th></tr><tr><td class="diff-blockheader" colspan="2">Line 10:</td> <td class="diff-blockheader" colspan="2">Line 10:</td> </tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">**In this article we assume that both detectors are SPADs of the same kind (both Excelitas SPADs, or both PDM-SPADs, or both tau-SPADs).**</td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">**In this article we assume that both detectors are SPADs of the same kind (both Excelitas SPADs, or both PDM-SPADs, or both tau-SPADs).**</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context"></td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">-</td><td class="diff-deletedline">If you are using either a **proper** (see below) 50/50&#160;<strong class="diff-mark">cube&#160;</strong>beamsplitter to split the signal between two detectors or a 100% mirror to direct the signal to one detector and then the other, but still observe very different count rates on the two detectors, this discrepancy could be due to the following reasons:</td><td class="diff-lineheader">+</td><td class="diff-addedline">If you are using either a **proper** (see below) 50/50 beamsplitter to split the signal between two detectors or a 100% mirror to direct the signal to one detector and then the other, but still observe very different count rates on the two detectors, this discrepancy could be due to the following reasons:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context"></td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">1. Misalignment of the Lens in Front of the SPAD:</td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">1. Misalignment of the Lens in Front of the SPAD:</td></tr> </table> text/html 2025-02-14T15:47:18+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.tcspc.de/doku.php/faq:why_do_i_not_get_the_same_count_rates_on_both_spad_detectors?rev=1739548038&do=diff <table><tr><th colspan="2" width="50%">2025/02/14 16:45</th><th colspan="2" width="50%">current</th></tr><tr><td class="diff-blockheader" colspan="2">Line 1:</td> <td class="diff-blockheader" colspan="2">Line 1:</td> </tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">====== Why do I not get the same count rates on both SPAD detectors? ======</td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">====== Why do I not get the same count rates on both SPAD detectors? ======</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">-</td><td class="diff-deletedline">{{tag&gt; detectors faq SPAD}}</td><td class="diff-lineheader">+</td><td class="diff-addedline">{{tag&gt; detectors faq SPAD&#160;<strong class="diff-mark">MT200</strong>}}</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context"></td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">**In this article we assume that both detectors are SPADs of the same kind (both Excelitas SPADs, or both PDM-SPADs, or both tau-SPADs).**</td><td class="diff-lineheader">&#160;</td><td class="diff-context">**In this article we assume that both detectors are SPADs of the same kind (both Excelitas SPADs, or both PDM-SPADs, or both tau-SPADs).**</td></tr> </table>